The ADRE may NOT discipline licensees for which of the following actions?

The correct choice indicates that the Arizona Department of Real Estate (ADRE) cannot discipline licensees for acting as disclosed dual agents. Disclosed dual agency occurs when a real estate licensee represents both the buyer and the seller in a transaction with the informed consent of all parties involved. This practice is permissible under Arizona law as long as the licensee fully discloses their dual agency status and the parties agree to it, ensuring transparency and maintaining ethical standards.

The rationale behind this is that when all parties are aware of the dual representation and consent to it, the dual agent's actions align with their fiduciary duties, provided that they manage potential conflicts of interest appropriately. Therefore, acting as a disclosed dual agent, when done correctly, does not warrant disciplinary action as it’s within the legal framework established for real estate transactions in Arizona. This highlights the importance of clear communication and informed consent in establishing trust and integrity within the real estate profession.

In contrast, misrepresentation, negligence, and signing for someone without proper authority (even with consent under certain conditions) can lead to disciplinary actions because they compromise ethical standards and the trust necessary in real estate transactions. These actions can negatively impact the integrity of the profession and the trust of the public, which is why