A week after their contract fell through, buyer Julie sued seller Omar for specific performance. What does this mean?

The correct choice highlights Julie's intention to compel Omar to fulfill his obligations under the original contract, which suggests that she still desires to complete the transaction and purchase the property. Specific performance is a legal remedy where a court orders a party to execute the terms of a contract rather than simply compensating the other party with monetary damages. In real estate transactions, this often occurs because the property is unique, making it difficult or impossible for the buyer to find an equivalent substitute. By suing for specific performance, Julie indicates she believes that the contract was valid and wants the court to enforce it, thereby requiring Omar to complete the sale as initially agreed.

In this context, the other choices do not accurately reflect the nature of her action. The suggestion that Julie caused the contract to fail does not pertain to her desire for specific performance. Seeking reimbursement for appraisal costs or the return of her earnest money deposit implies a different legal approach focused on damages or refunds rather than enforcing the contract itself. Thus, option B most clearly aligns with the meaning of seeking specific performance.